[OKGIS] NAIP Projections
Sughru, Mike
MPSughru at owrb.state.ok.us
Wed Mar 8 11:04:17 CST 2006
I prefer Albers. It's easier dealing with only one projection.
-----Original Message-----
From: okgis-bounces at gis.gis.ou.edu [mailto:okgis-bounces at gis.gis.ou.edu]On
Behalf Of David W. Lowther
Sent: Wednesday, March 08, 2006 10:59 AM
To: Oklahoma GIS Community
Subject: [OKGIS] NAIP Projections
Has it occurred to anyone to question the logic that is relied on to
generate these images in UTM?
While it is certainly possible to extract and re-project the images, it
seems like a completely unnecessary step. Does anyone know what drives the
use of UTM? Anyone on this list prefer UTM to OK State Plane or Albers?
David Lowther
Senior Software Engineer
Strategic Consulting International
405.227.9051
dlowther at scigis. com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://gis.ou.edu/pipermail/okgis/attachments/20060308/5da86182/attachment.htm
More information about the OKGIS
mailing list